TEXAS GOSPEL VOLUNTEER

Authorities in Arunachal Pradesh plan to enforce a decades-old law restricting religious conversions, following a court directive requiring its implementation by March. The Arunachal Pradesh Freedom of Religion Act, passed in 1978, was originally intended to prevent conversions by force or fraudulent means. However, strong opposition from local legislators and Christian organizations had previously prevented the law from being enforced. The recent decision to implement the law has raised concerns among religious groups about potential restrictions on religious freedom.

Christianity has grown significantly in Arunachal Pradesh since the late 1960s, despite past instances of persecution. Between 1968 and 1974, government actions included arrests, destruction of churches, and restrictions on religious gatherings. By the 1970s, Christianity had expanded enough to prompt legal and social opposition, including violent crackdowns and new laws aimed at limiting conversions. Despite these measures, the number of Christians in the state continued to rise, making it one of the largest religious groups in the region today.

The enforcement of the conversion law comes as Hindutva organizations have gained influence in the region. These groups have worked to formalize and promote indigenous faiths, framing them as cultural alternatives to Christianity. Schools, prayer centers, and religious texts have been introduced to reinforce traditional beliefs, and there have been reports of Christian gatherings being disrupted. The government, which had previously considered repealing the law, has now shifted toward enforcing it, in line with the growing influence of nationalist groups.

Legal and religious organizations have raised concerns that the enforcement of the law could lead to renewed restrictions on religious activities. Past incidents in the region have included government scrutiny of religious practices, as well as limitations on the construction of new places of worship. Reports indicate that religious gatherings have already faced opposition in certain areas, suggesting that implementation of the law may result in increased monitoring and regulation of religious activities.

Christian groups in the state are organizing protests and legal challenges in response to the decision. A demonstration is planned for early March, coinciding with discussions on the law in the state assembly. Organizations advocating for religious freedom argue that the enforcement of the law could lead to further restrictions, despite constitutional protections guaranteeing the right to practice and propagate religion. The outcome of these legal and political efforts remains uncertain as the deadline for enforcement approaches.